The article "All My Life for Sale" is very interesting in the respect that the author makes very profound claims as to what we, as humans consider a crucial part of our identities. On the surface, the article addresses the age-old cliche of 'one man's junk is another man's treasure', but the author continues to express deeper concerns, which appear to evoke an existentialistic kind of tone. Just the fact that he sold all of his belongings in order to find himself further reinforces the exitentialistic attitudes. You see a transformation in the speaker. He began questioning why he had all the 'stuff' he did. He wanted to change things, to see what would happen if he took all the things out of his life that distracted him. He wanted to start over; to turn his own world upside down. He wanted to create a new identity for himself. But, overall, it's not the material things that make you, you. It's the human interaction you get from sharing those material items. After visiting all the people that had bought all of his items, he came to this realization. He figured out that it wasn't about the items he had sold, but the people he had sold them to. He no longer felt uncomfortable around strangers. He had found himself. And ultimately learned that no matter how hard things get, you eventually have to face life head-on. You can't escape it forever.
I felt the audio recording of George Carlin further reinforced our obsession with material things. Satire in nature, the recording brought up a good point. We are nothing but hoarders in a sense. Everywhere we go, we have to have 'stuff' with us. He made the comparison of houses being nothing but storage sheds for our 'stuff', and that whenever we travel we always have to have a piece of that storage shed with us at all times. Material things don't really matter in the end and they certainly aren't the most important part of our identities. Yet, we tend to revere 'stuff' more than all other things. I don't think mankind will ever be satisfied without 'stuff'.
Friday, January 21, 2011
Reflection on my writing process.
I usually start writing without a very clear idea of where I'm going to go with it. I can't remember ever making an outline for a paper when I wasn't required to do so. Referencing what we talked about previously in class, my thoughts tend to form as I write and not before. Any "steps" in my writing process are not really in any semi-consistent order...researching, mental outlining, editing, and writing are mixed up so that they often take place at the same time. The only step that is (probably obviously) consistent is proofreading and editing the final version of a paper before I consider it finished.
Reflection on my writing process
I begin my writing by brainstorming. Most of the time I keep these ideas in my brain but sometimes I’ll share them with a friend just to say it out loud or ask their opinion about how my thesis sounds. I start by writing a thesis then follow by supporting paragraphs and then a conclusion. I use the basic writing style unless told other wise. While I’m writing the paper I will usually read the paper out loud from the beginning to where I am currently in the paper. It helps me think about what I can write next. That is pretty much all I do when I write. If it is a boring topic or very long I will take breaks by checking my Facebook or watching a show then go back to it. If I’m feeling really studious I’ll do more research on the topic to get my juices flowing but I feel like a lot of the papers I have to write are opinion based. After all this the conclusion of my paper I just some up everything I have stated.
Real Writing
Usually, whenever I write, no matter what it is about, I need to find my muse. Last year for my research paper, my topic was about the sexism and racism in Disney films, specifically The Hunchback of Notre Dame. I started off by watching the movie and after I realized I wanted to focus on the characters, I made my topic. From there I watched the movie again with a whole different approach, writing notes and then looking up a few facts that would back up what I had seen. For a research paper, I take a different approach than when I write other papers. I don’t free write like I usually do, but I did write notes in the margins of facts I wanted to add or topics I wanted to elaborate on. Truthfully, my prewriting draft was a lot of arrows, scribbles, and notes that only made sense to me. My first draft wasn’t much better. It was very messy, because I went through with my red pen and destroyed my work. Even when I write papers that aren’t as long, I still have to find a muse. From there, I take the free writing approach and I am able to go back and clean it up a bit. I like doing that kind of writing instead because it’s easier for me to just continue with a thought and not have to worry about run on sentences, grammatical errors, or different words that would make it sound better. This kind of thought it pure, in my opinion, and it is my favourite to do.
My writing process
The beginning of my writing process usually starts with me brainstorming. I try to formulate all my ideas that I want to get into what I’m writing into an easy to understand yet interesting order. This is one of the most important steps of my writing process because it keeps my writing organized.
Next, depending on what I am writing I will do research on what I am about to write in the paper. I’ll use internet sources usually to go into deeper depth on what I already know that I want to put into my paper.
After actually writing and completing the paper, I like to read over what I have written several times and possibly have someone else I know read over as they can catch a lot of the things that I miss. This along with the brainstorming process is very important because I know from experience that just depending on spell check isn’t always the best.
Writing Process
My writing process changes according to the material I am writing. If I am writing something research based or something presentational, I start out with looking through books or web pages, and formulate a really loose outline. If it is creative writing, or fiction, I tend to either jump into it or let ideas build up and play out in my mind. The part of the process I tend to neglect the most is the revision and editing part of writing. I can free-write and usually it tends to be at least decent, and has little to no grammatical or spelling errors. However, I don’t disregard this part because of time or apathy—I usually struggle with going back in and making it something better. The end result seems as if it was ‘patched together’ in a sense. I am not sure if not putting too much emphasis on revision works for me, or if I simply do not know how to do it adequately.
My Writing Process
When I am writing a research paper I always try and find as much information on the subject as I can before I start writing. Then I decide what parts of the topic I want to focus on. Once I do that I organize my sources of research accordingly. After my research is organize I finally start to write. First I start by making my Introduction paragraph and decide what my thesis is going to say. Once my Intoduction and thesis are done I start the body incerting facts from my research when needed.
My Writing Process
Before I start writing I take the topic and if I have information on the topic I organize it into somewhat of an order that it is am going to be used in the paper. Then I break it down into an outline with the order in which my information goes or what I am going to talk about in the paper so that it is organized. Then I develop my thesis statement for my paper and then I begin writing my introduction. Then I follow along with my outline and start writing the body paragraphs for my paper. After I finish the body paragraphs I write the conclusion paragraph. After I am completely finished writing my paper I reread it to make sure that it all makes sense and the paragraphs and information are in order and make changes. Then I read through my paper a second time and try to correct grammar and spelling errors.
My Writing Process
When I am presented with a writing assignment my writing process starts. First I think of as many ideas about the topic or of a topic that interests me. I like to put my ideas on paper, not exactly in any order yet. As I explore my mind I write down everything I can think of. After this process I review my thoughts and organize them into sections for future paragraphs. As I begin to write my first paragraph I tell the reader what they are about to read in an organized well structured paragraph. As I go on with my paper I refer back to my opening paragraph throughout my paper because it sets the tone for the rest of my paper, and it helps me to keep my flow. After I feel my paper is done I print it and make corrections as I feel they are needed.
Also I use scholarly journal articles along with other credible sources.
Also I use scholarly journal articles along with other credible sources.
My Writing Process
I think that my writing process is fairly simple. first i get the topic then i think in my head what i know about this topic and where i can take it. Then i write down all the things that i want to talk about with it. Like is it a polarized subject and how much research i really am going to have to do on it. Next i probably would just write down all my thoughts on how i am going to structure my paper. i don't really like doing drafts so i just write up a really long paper and kind of edit it to how i want it to look.
Typically i would write a thesis in the beginning of my paper because you have to give your audience a sense of what you are about to talk about. But most of the time I really don't know what to say so I just go straight into the main points of my paper. I know that i need a lot of work but this is how my writing process is.
My writing process
My personal writing process usually starts with me brainstorming and then making a few notes on what I want to write about. I like to get all of the subjects I'd like to cover onto paper, and then think about ways to connect all of my ideas so that the paper flows smoothly. Once I've written out all of the topics I plan to write about, I'll then attempt to construct a thesis based on that. I don't generally plan out my thesis too thoroughly, because I like to just get something written without getting too stalled, and then I'll fix up the thesis where I feel it is necessary. Once I've written out the thesis, I'll use the ideas that I've already mapped out to construct the rest of the writing. Typically, I just like to get in the flow of writing, so I'll pretty much just continue writing until it's complete. After I've finished the first draft, I'll read through the work and try to visualize it as if I was reading from another person's perspective, and gauge whether it's halfway decent or not. As I read, I'll correct spelling and grammatical errors, as well as add, move, or erase text as I see fit.
Writing Process
When it comes to writing, I usually jump right into it without planning, or outlining what I want to write. I usually just let my ideas flow freely and then depending on what type of paper it is, I take various steps to edit and then re-edit in order to make it cohesive. With research papers, I obviously have to research information, but if I have some knowledge of the subject before researching, I try to make sure I incorporate those thoughts without any other works to sway my opinions in a different direction. I do admit, my opinions about certain topics do change after researching, which I find irritating. I feel my papers are genuine to who I am. It's to make all writing my own. Overall, I work quickly without planning, usually a few days before the assignment is due, with a ton of self-editing.
My Writing Process
From the fourth grade on, I had teachers forcing me to make notecards and outlines for papers and I really hated it. Honestly, I just like to dive right into a piece. I will read the paper over, over and over again, adding or taking things out, moving things around, and so on. My papers usually turn out just as structured and well put together as anyone elses, so I never saw a problem with this method.
Perhaps it would be less time consuming to outline what I want first, but it's always possible to come across more research that one finds interesting, or to decide that something isn't as relelvant as one had thought, in which case that outline seems like a waste of time after all.
I do some research before I start writing, but sometimes like continue to look at new things as I go along. This too makes the outlines and notecards seem like a waste of time. I think it's better to just start with one idea and start writing and researching and see where it takes you.
Perhaps it would be less time consuming to outline what I want first, but it's always possible to come across more research that one finds interesting, or to decide that something isn't as relelvant as one had thought, in which case that outline seems like a waste of time after all.
I do some research before I start writing, but sometimes like continue to look at new things as I go along. This too makes the outlines and notecards seem like a waste of time. I think it's better to just start with one idea and start writing and researching and see where it takes you.
My writing process
When I first start out writing a paper I try to come up with a rough draft of my thesis. After I complete that I will then work off of my thesis. In college writing one all of our papers were supposed to be in the five paragraph form, so I am very comfortable now writing like that. I actually prefer writing it in a five paragraph form because it helps me stay very organized and neat and have everything in place. So the entire time I write my paper I continue to go back to my thesis to try to make it as powerful as I can. Then after I feel confident enough in my thesis I would then try to figure out what my three strongest points are. After figuring out what my strongest points or arguments are I will go through each one of them one by one and talk about them and make them into strong paragraphs and arguments. After I finish that I just combine everything into my conclusion paragraph and sum everything up. This would have to be my favorite way to write a paper mainly because I am very used to it by now and it keeps me organized and neat which is a big part of helping me write the best paper possible.
The Writing Process
My steps for the writing process are usually straight forward. I try to think of a topic that I like, that also pertains to the prompt that I am given. As I am deciding on a topic, I look up a little information about the topic to make sure I will like it and that I will have enough information to write about. Then, I like to make a rough outline of how I think it will flow nicely. Once I have the rough outline, I make a more in depth outline summarizing my main ideas with the research that I have done. I finally start writing my rough draft and every time I come back to it I always reread and edit while I write it. After many times of writing it I print it out and read it over and write over things that I do not like then add, subtract, and change as much as I feel is needed, sometimes it's a little too much editing. When I think that I am getting close to be finishing I make someone proofread it and make any additional changes that need to be made.
My Writing Process
My writing process is usually very informal. I take my topic and try to divide it into at least three different subjects with in the main topic. Then I take the length the paper is suppose to be and try to figure out how long each of those sub topics need to be. All of this is usually just in my head; I have yet to write anything down at this stage.
If the assignment is a research paper I would then begin to look for information. I might do this sooner if I have no knowledge of the topic, so I know how I want to divide it. After that my writing process is pretty flimsy, I just go from there, writing from topic to topic. After the paper is done, I’ll go back look for any mistakes, items I would like to change, like move sentences or paragraphs. On average that is how I write all my papers.
If the assignment is a research paper I would then begin to look for information. I might do this sooner if I have no knowledge of the topic, so I know how I want to divide it. After that my writing process is pretty flimsy, I just go from there, writing from topic to topic. After the paper is done, I’ll go back look for any mistakes, items I would like to change, like move sentences or paragraphs. On average that is how I write all my papers.
MY writing process
When I write I typically start thinking up ideas immediately after a prompt is introduced. I jot down the ideas in my head that seem relevant and/or interesting. I then just sit and try to start writing whatever comes to mind. Usually I end up with a paragraph that has no end, sentences here and there, and lots of things scratched out. In fact, most of this just becomes trash and I don't even use it in my papers.
I suppose that is my way of brainstorming. Some people like outlines and some like to use diagrams and all that fancy stuff, but I find that using organization methods like that make me feel trapped. I feel writing should be an adaptable process, one that can change often. Therefore, I don't like using methods that feel limiting and structured.
After my "brainstorming" routine, I then really start to think about what it is I am suppossed to be doing (who my audience is, what their expectations are, what kind of paper is it, etc.) and I go back and see what I've done thus far. If it is relevant, I consider keeping it, if it isn't I pitch it. Once I feel I have a good grasp on what my obligations are, I continue to work from there. Just writing and writing. At some point I go back and reread. I take notes about what I have written in certain spots (about it's content, grammer, relevance, maybe it would fit better somewhere else, etc.). Then, I again go over my obligations and do my best to make sure I have met them (because I have been known to stray). This is when I start to type up everything and that is when things change the most. I start thinking up new ideas and what not and I incorporate them and get rid of other things.
Finally, I let someone else read what I've written and provide input. Of course, this stage usually leads to more revision.
I suppose that is my way of brainstorming. Some people like outlines and some like to use diagrams and all that fancy stuff, but I find that using organization methods like that make me feel trapped. I feel writing should be an adaptable process, one that can change often. Therefore, I don't like using methods that feel limiting and structured.
After my "brainstorming" routine, I then really start to think about what it is I am suppossed to be doing (who my audience is, what their expectations are, what kind of paper is it, etc.) and I go back and see what I've done thus far. If it is relevant, I consider keeping it, if it isn't I pitch it. Once I feel I have a good grasp on what my obligations are, I continue to work from there. Just writing and writing. At some point I go back and reread. I take notes about what I have written in certain spots (about it's content, grammer, relevance, maybe it would fit better somewhere else, etc.). Then, I again go over my obligations and do my best to make sure I have met them (because I have been known to stray). This is when I start to type up everything and that is when things change the most. I start thinking up new ideas and what not and I incorporate them and get rid of other things.
Finally, I let someone else read what I've written and provide input. Of course, this stage usually leads to more revision.
My Writing Process
My wiritng process for the most part is very simple. I like to gather all my research on the topic and then think about what I want to say and how to organize my writing. After I'm done with the research I ususally make a very basic outline just so I can organize my thoughts and know in what order I will present my points. I then begin to write the paper within the guidelines of the outline I made. After the paper is written I proofread the paper and decide if I like how it was organized and usually add more details. Most of the time I will end up switching paragraphs or moving things around before I hand it in. This is my typical writing process but it does sometimes vary due to the type of paper i write.
Reflection
I would say that my writing process is just being direct and straight to the point. I dont ever really do any brainstorming or deciding what I am going to write in any form other than in my head. I just have my topic in mind and write on what I have to say about it. My writing process involves research when called for, but generally, I just write what ever comes to mind while thinking about the topic and/or prompt. Here's a basic guide to my process: Step one, read the prompt and decide on opinion or answer options. Step two, do any necessary research or factfinding. Step three, write my paper (generally I like to type). Laslty, do some revision and editing and hand it in.
My Writing Process.
I don't really think about what I am going to write before I begin. Obviously I know what my topic will be, but my specifics are not planned. Thoughts come as I type, so here they are. Even when I have to write essays or research papers, my "planning process" is very short to non-existent. I might do some research, write something about what I just found, and then maybe research some more.
My writing process isn't really linear at all; it's actually very jumpy. I plan, write, and edit all at the same time. For my thoughts to be best conveyed, I think it is necessary that I write them as I create them. They might need some fixing here and there, but for the most part what I think is what I write.
If I had to name some steps, they might go something like this:
- Get a topic somehow - whether it is given to me or chosen by me.
- Get a pencil and paper, or open Pages on my computer.
- Write my thoughts.
My Writing Process
When I start writing, I choose a topic that I think is interesting and that will also relate to the people that are reading it. I then begin to make an outline of what points I want to touch on and decide which are more significant than the others. I then start researching the topic and gather all the information I can find. I read the info and decide what I want to encorporate into my paper. Then I start to organize the information according to the way I want my presentation to flow. After I organize it, I like to write a first draft. When I complete the first, I revise it and have friends or family read it to get their input. I make further revisions and make a second draft. I also proof read this draft and have friends read it again. I then make the last draft and revise it again to make sure there are no mistakes.
Ann Raimes
I think that Ann's Critical Reading tips were very detailed and helpful. I have not heard of some of the tips that she stated such as examining the table of contents of the book before reading, or skim through the book to find interesting points that the book or article will cover. I found it very helpful because I extremely dislike reading text books fir class and most of the time when I am done reading I cannot remember a thing that I have just read. I feel that by enforcing these strategies while reading will help me retain what I have read. By looking at the table of contents, you can get prepared for what you are about to read and be more active than passive.
I also found the writing tips helpful. When I start writing, I usually did not think of the audience when I would be writing a paper. I learned that the audience is one of the most important factors that go into writing a paper. I was aware of the effect that I wanted to have on the reader and I also do a good job of keeping my papers organized, however a well organized paper will mean nothing if the reader is no interested in what you are talking about. I feel like these tips will help improve my writing style and will be more satisfying to my audience.
I found the Ann Raimes reading to be an interesting take on the process of reading, and I agree with much of what she says. I have always felt, as Raimes explains in her writing, that reading is the best way to become a better writer. I, myself, would probably still have the vocabulary of a 3rd-grader if I never read a book. Not only does reading broaden vocabulary, but it is a great way to open your mind up to new ideas. Whether it be a novel, an autobiography, or any other genre of writing, while reading a person is constantly engaged in another person's ideas which are separate from their own, which naturally results in learning.
I feel that writing, even for a class, is a very intimate experience. When anyone shares any type of writing their thoughts and opinions shine through, even if they're not necessarily trying to do so. It is a natural occurrence when someone writes something. When I write, I actually try to embrace my personality and convey it to whoever is reading my work. As Raimes expressed in the article, we are constantly striving to discover who we are, and I completely agree that reading and writing help to develop ourselves as individuals as well as understand and learn from other individuals.
I feel that writing, even for a class, is a very intimate experience. When anyone shares any type of writing their thoughts and opinions shine through, even if they're not necessarily trying to do so. It is a natural occurrence when someone writes something. When I write, I actually try to embrace my personality and convey it to whoever is reading my work. As Raimes expressed in the article, we are constantly striving to discover who we are, and I completely agree that reading and writing help to develop ourselves as individuals as well as understand and learn from other individuals.
Thursday, January 20, 2011
1st Post
Personally, I'd say I have a pretty decent amount of experience writing electronically. I've done a lot of blogging in the past, and am currently writing a blog for TheBurr.com. I'm also constantly texting and e-mailing like every other Kent State student.
Overall I'd say my writing changes substantially when writing electronically as compared to writing with pen and paper. When I write a blog for instance, I can simply spit out whatever thoughts are on mind and then simply go back, move something to another place, make grammatical corrections, and edit anything else that needs to be fixed all in a matter of a few minutes, maybe even seconds. When I write with pen and paper on the other hand, I take a lot longer to write something because I need to pause and make sure every sentence says exactly what I want it to, and also to make sure I'm not making any other mistakes along the way. Obviously for the reasons previously explained, I enjoy writing electronically much more, and seldom write with pen and paper.
Overall I'd say my writing changes substantially when writing electronically as compared to writing with pen and paper. When I write a blog for instance, I can simply spit out whatever thoughts are on mind and then simply go back, move something to another place, make grammatical corrections, and edit anything else that needs to be fixed all in a matter of a few minutes, maybe even seconds. When I write with pen and paper on the other hand, I take a lot longer to write something because I need to pause and make sure every sentence says exactly what I want it to, and also to make sure I'm not making any other mistakes along the way. Obviously for the reasons previously explained, I enjoy writing electronically much more, and seldom write with pen and paper.
Wednesday, January 19, 2011
Anne Raimes Introduction
Overall, her strategies for analytical reading were decent. I didn't really learn anything from it; being in AP English all throughout high school, my instructors drilled critical analyses into our minds. When it comes to identity, I appreciate her brief overview of what identity entails. I never really thought of identity as a driving force of society, but it makes perfect sense. We, as human beings are all different and unique and it's up to our individuality to make this world function culturally. I never really thought about what it means to be me. I have never really sat down and asked myself this before. I am still trying to figure out who I am and what I want to do with my life.
I appreciate the authors two-way comparison in which she claims that "culture shapes and influences us, but does not exist apart from us". Culture can shape who we are, but we can shape culture as well. She continues on to explain that culture is simply not about the literature, art, or music of the time; it's about the customs, products, and the expectations that come with the ever-changing ideologies of society. Culture is what we think, say, and do. It is where we live and who we interact with. Identity is culture.
I appreciate the authors two-way comparison in which she claims that "culture shapes and influences us, but does not exist apart from us". Culture can shape who we are, but we can shape culture as well. She continues on to explain that culture is simply not about the literature, art, or music of the time; it's about the customs, products, and the expectations that come with the ever-changing ideologies of society. Culture is what we think, say, and do. It is where we live and who we interact with. Identity is culture.
Ann Raimes Reflection
I feel that when you look into identity and figuring out your own identity that it goes a lot with self independence and growing up, things that you would learn through time and experience. Of course identity goes along with gender, age, ethnicity, etc...., but the defining line is whether or not you open yourself to different forms of identity. For example, I am part of the Sigma Chi Fraternity, and I feel my identity changed when I joined Sigma Chi, because it is something I share with only my brothers. Granted it might seem more secluded and secret, but I feel experiences like this help to diversify oneself in finding their identity.
To reference Ann Raimes when she said "They ask: What does it mean to be old or young, male or female, gay or straight; rich or poor; black, white, Jewish, Latino, or Asian; single; married; or divorced; and so on?"
I feel as if the only way to answer the questions that Ann Raimes raises would be to live your life regularly, because you can't know what it's like to be married if your only 7 years old. Granted I do understand in certain cultures the age of marriage is low, but I believe that it requires experience with age, and your surroundings that define who you are. That too can change for any person if they were to for example go to college out of the country. They would be breaking out of their personal boundary in which they would live in a different lifestyle and could understand the identity of those around them that they would consider to be out of the norm.
When Ann Raimes goes on to speak about reading critically I feel that her argument is very correct in how she explains herself. When she states that reading critically involves not only the writer but also the reader itself. It helps to interpret in your own identity in a way as well as what the writers identity is to. The fact that Ann Raimes lists strategies for critical reading shows that she is concerned about the reader understanding fully what she is saying as well as teaching you(the reader) how to interpret other college level work.
Anne Raimes
I feel as though the guide that she offers for critical reading is a little more complex than I had previously thought the reading and writing process to be. In my personal opinion it is much easier to read when you are not so much worried about the little details as opposed to the general picture of the piece. I agree with the idea of rereading if more clarity is needed, but to read as in depth as she is suggesting is often going to be overkill and not reallt necessary at all. I much prefer her opinions on writing. She seems to have a solid outline as to whae writing process should be and how best to create a work that the reader is both going to enoy and at the same time get the information being provided. The idea of writing as a way of learning was also of interest to me. I think that writing about things is an excellent way to get to know things about yourself and your own thoughts. It allows you to put onto paper exactly what you think and see it for what it is.
Ann Raimes Introduction
I felt that Ann Raimes had some very good strategies. I think that everyone has been told that this is the way that you should write a paper and that this is the way you should read it so you can better understand it. But I think that everyone cannot learn the same way, just because a simple tip or strategy worked for someone doesnt mean its going to work for others. Everyone has there own way of learning and I think that people stick to whats going to help them instead of ok this woman is an expert and her tips sound good and what she has said must be true so I will do it.
Some of the things that I agree with were when she gave the startegy on previewing when you are reading an article or book. I think that everyone has previewed or skimmed through an article that they had to read for a class or something because we dont actually read the whole thing word for word and try to understand it especially if it is a new topic to us.
When I read I do try to have an open mind, mostly when it is a topic I am new to. I was a bit confused on the point she was trying to make, sometimes i felt that her point was that people need to enjoy reading we should be active readers and sometimes i felt that she was trying to say that this is the way that you are supposed to read and write critically. But still I feel that everyone learns in their own way.
Some of the things that I agree with were when she gave the startegy on previewing when you are reading an article or book. I think that everyone has previewed or skimmed through an article that they had to read for a class or something because we dont actually read the whole thing word for word and try to understand it especially if it is a new topic to us.
When I read I do try to have an open mind, mostly when it is a topic I am new to. I was a bit confused on the point she was trying to make, sometimes i felt that her point was that people need to enjoy reading we should be active readers and sometimes i felt that she was trying to say that this is the way that you are supposed to read and write critically. But still I feel that everyone learns in their own way.
Anne Raimes
As I was reading the critical reading and writing tips, my thoughts on the two subjects were quite different. While I thought the writing strategies seemed very helpful to me, I thought the critical reading strategies to be slightly overbearing.
I’ll start with the writing strategies. Figuring out what you want the purpose of your paper to be at the beginning always helps a tremendous amount. Whether you’re writing a persuasion, informative, or an observational paper, figuring it out can help boost start you’re writing process. Also, figuring out what reader I’m writing to helps a ton. If you’re writing to an audience that isn’t as versed in a subject as you are, you probably wouldn’t want to be including vocabulary that the reader would not understand.
Now onto the critical reading strategies, which in my opinion, include several strategies that I find pointless, to be blunt. Things like finding out where the selection was published and what date it was published seem like it would just take time away from focusing on what is important in the selection you are reading.
That’s not to say there aren’t some critical reading strategies that I definitely find helpful. For one, skimming the reading for italicized and bold words, I find to be very helpful. Rereading the material over again also helps me understand the material nearly every time.
Ann Raimes
In this article by Ann Raimes she discusses critical reading skills that will help a person to better understand and interpret the information he or she is reading. Throughout my life I have read a lot, and been given tips and ideas on how to be a more competent reader. When I read, I do not do anything that was discussed in the article, as I find myself racing through readings trying to just get them finished. After going over these critical reading strategies, I feel as though I am definitely going to incorporate them into my life. I have always had my own books that I am able to write in or highlight words. This semester I am going to incorporate some of these critical reading strategies into my life, in order to become a more understanding reader. In the article, it talks about how a person may have to read something more than just one time in order to understand the content. As this semester progresses I am going to be re-reading more information so that I can embed it in my brain, and so that it will not be forgotten as easily. In addition, I am going to incorporate the use of circling words and defining them, I really enjoyed reading the article that had the written notes on the side, as it made it very easy to understand. I think that this was a great first article to read and will be of great help in my near and apparent future here at Kent State University.
Ann Ramies on reading and writing
Ann Ramies makes many observations of reading and writing. Throughout the years I have heard the strategies Ramies talked about, like underlining words and looking up their definitions, paying attention to details, writing in margins, etc. I think they are affective but often forget to do them. I never thought to do what she suggested about previewing the reading. It is a logical way to better understand the writer and their writing. I like all the suggestions that Ramies gave but I don’t think I would ever really do them. I mean I do my best to pay attention to details while I’m reading by highlighting and underlining but I don’t think students will really take the time to understand the writer by previewing their writing and what not. I think the main problem students come across is staying focus while reading. It took me almost all day to read the full passage, I found my mind wondering the whole time or thinking about how boring it was. I think it had to do with the fact that I have heard the things she was saying before and I didn’t find much interest in it at all. She made many good points but to me they were very redundant. They were almost common sense too, if you don’t understand or know a word, look it up. Who doesn’t think to do that? Why just struggle with it. I think I was taught to use the dictionary when I could read. Now with the technology today looking words up is as simple as typing it into your search browser or dictionary.com widget. When it comes to Ramies’s ideas on writing I have also heard of these strategies but unlike her reading strategies I do them. I do sometimes brainstorm about a topic before writing out my paper or whatever it is I’m writing. I agree with what she says about writing being a way of learning, learning about yourself and styles of writing. All in all Ramies brings up good points and strategies but nothing she said was anything new to me.
Ann Raimes
Introduction, by Ann Raimes was a really interesting work. It gave you a closer look into critical reading which I felt should give most people a better idea of critically writing. I appreciated that the author explained how to understand a piece of writing like this and then showed an example of how to execute it. It was clear and concise. I enjoyed the excerpt of Knowing Oneself and Others. It made me think about how society was created based on how people live together but people live so differently in all aprts of the world, so many opposing ideas and beliefs are socially acceptable in these areas. We are shaped by our culture, trying to live up to these ideas in one part of the world or reject them in another. For example, if a person is convicted of a crime in one country but flees for safety to another country, that country will most likely be asked to return the fugitive. Whether they do or do not comply, their decision must be respected or other actions must be taken to reclaim the criminal. Either action is thought of as saocially acceptable by both parties, they may not agree but they understand that they each act on the beliefs they have within their own society.
Ann Raines
I think that Ann Raines is right when she says "Our identities change to fit
into various cultural communities as members of families, age
groups, ethnic groups, or institutions like churches, colleges, and
businesses." I believe this because I have seen how people change when put in a new area. For example I knew a small town girl who moved to the city and became almost a completely different person. Because there are so many factors that help create our identities and because they can change rather easily there are many different identities that people might have. And with a verity of identities you have a verity of views and opinions. Which is why I also agree with Raines that you have to keep an open mind when reading because the author is most likely going to look at the world differently than you do. And if you are not willing to try and understand their point of view, whether you agree with it or not,you will not be able to learn.
I also feel that the part about reading more critically is something that every one should do.However it is some thing that I've been told to do all through school. And what I find is that when your told something again and again you stop listening no matter how important it is. So I found that the critical reading part was for me hard to stay focused because I have heard about it so many times.
into various cultural communities as members of families, age
groups, ethnic groups, or institutions like churches, colleges, and
businesses." I believe this because I have seen how people change when put in a new area. For example I knew a small town girl who moved to the city and became almost a completely different person. Because there are so many factors that help create our identities and because they can change rather easily there are many different identities that people might have. And with a verity of identities you have a verity of views and opinions. Which is why I also agree with Raines that you have to keep an open mind when reading because the author is most likely going to look at the world differently than you do. And if you are not willing to try and understand their point of view, whether you agree with it or not,you will not be able to learn.
I also feel that the part about reading more critically is something that every one should do.However it is some thing that I've been told to do all through school. And what I find is that when your told something again and again you stop listening no matter how important it is. So I found that the critical reading part was for me hard to stay focused because I have heard about it so many times.
Bailey A: Ann Raimes
I really enjoyed Ann's perspective of how we don't define ourselves by what's inside, rather what is around us. You could be the exact same person but if you grew up in Africa instead of the United States, you would act and speak totally different. I believe that the saying "we are who we surround ourselves with" stands true and I would like to think Ann thinks that as well.
Critically reading is extremely important, which is clear due to Ann's emphasis on it. Reading in general opens your mind to new ideas, new ways of thinking and broadens your vocabulary. What I got out of Ann's perspective on critically reading is that before you start you must remind yourself to keep an open mind to other people's way of thinking if you want to be successful in your reading.
Aside from reading, writing is crucial to anyone's development. It allows you to express your ideas in an art form; whether it be poetry, essay or story-telling. The best part of writing is that the more you do it, the better you become at it. With a few basic skills like grammar and punctuation as well as a clear understanding on sentence structure, anyone can become a successful writer.
Reading and writing are the fundamentals of being successful in any culture, its a way of communicating and I believe that is what Ann wanted us to get out of her introduction.
Critically reading is extremely important, which is clear due to Ann's emphasis on it. Reading in general opens your mind to new ideas, new ways of thinking and broadens your vocabulary. What I got out of Ann's perspective on critically reading is that before you start you must remind yourself to keep an open mind to other people's way of thinking if you want to be successful in your reading.
Aside from reading, writing is crucial to anyone's development. It allows you to express your ideas in an art form; whether it be poetry, essay or story-telling. The best part of writing is that the more you do it, the better you become at it. With a few basic skills like grammar and punctuation as well as a clear understanding on sentence structure, anyone can become a successful writer.
Reading and writing are the fundamentals of being successful in any culture, its a way of communicating and I believe that is what Ann wanted us to get out of her introduction.
Ann Raimes' Introduction
Raimes' "strategies for critical reading" are useful, even if they're probably nothing new to most people who have read anything that has challenged them. It may be a rehashing of ideas, but they're not bad ideas. Most of her strategies are things I think a lot of people do instinctively when reading. Which makes the reading of her introduction dull, even if the information is accurate.
I had the same reaction to her writing strategies. Nothing new, but still useful information, which she communicated clearly.
I had the same reaction to her writing strategies. Nothing new, but still useful information, which she communicated clearly.
Ann Raimes
The Ann Raimes introduction made me actually think more about the reading and writing process. She says how as we age we struggle with trying to "find ourselves" and "discover who we are" and that we do not just come to this conclusion all on our own. Everything around us shapes who we become and plays are role in our identity. As we compare our similarities and differences with others it helps us learn and come closer to discovering who we are.
When Ann Raines went into more detail about reading critically I was a little unsure of what she meant because with my experiences with reading not many of my teachers went through and explained this process and how important it is. I was not really aware that the main point of when your reading is not just understanding the point the writer was trying to make but also seeing how the writers point of view is created and what circumstances give rise to it. Ann Raimes explains it as assessing how the views are similar to or different from out own, and why. When you think of reading in that way it makes you think of what your reading more in depth. Plus with the strategies she talks about and how to use them like rereading, underlining, writing questions in the margains, looking up words that your unsure, and examining the book before you read and getting information about the author seem like really effective ways to help get the most out of what you are reading.
Also the way that Ann Raimes described strategies from the writing process will also be helpful for my future writing processes. She breaks down the process of writing a paper and says that there is more than just writing a paper, having a few peers review it, and then turning in the paper as the final one. She was not just explaining what a good paper is she really explains how the process works and all the guidelines to follow in order to become better at writing papers and also how your writing becomes a piece of reading material for someone else and it will recieve critical reading. Overall I think Ann Raimes Introduction was a very helpful selection to read and will deffinately help the next time I am reading something or am writing a paper.
When Ann Raines went into more detail about reading critically I was a little unsure of what she meant because with my experiences with reading not many of my teachers went through and explained this process and how important it is. I was not really aware that the main point of when your reading is not just understanding the point the writer was trying to make but also seeing how the writers point of view is created and what circumstances give rise to it. Ann Raimes explains it as assessing how the views are similar to or different from out own, and why. When you think of reading in that way it makes you think of what your reading more in depth. Plus with the strategies she talks about and how to use them like rereading, underlining, writing questions in the margains, looking up words that your unsure, and examining the book before you read and getting information about the author seem like really effective ways to help get the most out of what you are reading.
Also the way that Ann Raimes described strategies from the writing process will also be helpful for my future writing processes. She breaks down the process of writing a paper and says that there is more than just writing a paper, having a few peers review it, and then turning in the paper as the final one. She was not just explaining what a good paper is she really explains how the process works and all the guidelines to follow in order to become better at writing papers and also how your writing becomes a piece of reading material for someone else and it will recieve critical reading. Overall I think Ann Raimes Introduction was a very helpful selection to read and will deffinately help the next time I am reading something or am writing a paper.
Tuesday, January 18, 2011
Ann Raimes
After reading this selection, I was given a better understanding on how to effectively read pieces of writing. In my previous education I have never been taught anything on critical reading. We were always had the writing process pounded in my head, while Ann Raimes talks about how we need to be able to read a selection, understand it, and analyze it.
I found myself already doing some of the things that Ann Raimes suggested. Through boring parts of the readings I do, I often find myself having to read and re read certain sections. The notes, circling, and underlining are all strategies that I've never attempted or heard of. I believe for some readings, these tactics could be very useful such as a research for a paper or studying. These could be useful because you have to be able to go back through your readings and thoroughly understand what you were thinking the first time you read it. As for books that are being read for things such as entertainment, I dont believe these tactics are quite necessary. I feel that a good book would not have to be re read. It should be captivating and the information that is read the first time should be easily retained for quite a long period of time.
Overall, I found the writing by Ann Raimes to be useful and informational. I was able to see some new ways to understand the passages that we read, and i'm sure it will help with the upcoming readings that we have to blog about for this class.
I found myself already doing some of the things that Ann Raimes suggested. Through boring parts of the readings I do, I often find myself having to read and re read certain sections. The notes, circling, and underlining are all strategies that I've never attempted or heard of. I believe for some readings, these tactics could be very useful such as a research for a paper or studying. These could be useful because you have to be able to go back through your readings and thoroughly understand what you were thinking the first time you read it. As for books that are being read for things such as entertainment, I dont believe these tactics are quite necessary. I feel that a good book would not have to be re read. It should be captivating and the information that is read the first time should be easily retained for quite a long period of time.
Overall, I found the writing by Ann Raimes to be useful and informational. I was able to see some new ways to understand the passages that we read, and i'm sure it will help with the upcoming readings that we have to blog about for this class.
Ann Raimes & Critical Reading
Identity is certainly an important topic of discussion, especially in a college class. I can agree with Raimes that many of us are trying to “find ourselves.” She makes a good point in saying that we do not find our identities in isolation, and it is true also that we do not find them instantaneously. Self-discovery takes time and the influence of many things, including good writing.
Reading further, into her instructions for critical reading I still can’t say I disagree necessarily with what Raimes is saying, however, I felt almost as if I were wasting my time. We, as students, have been told to reread and jot down notes as we go for years. Looking words up in the dictionary that one doesn’t know should be common sense. Questioning the meaning of a piece of writing and reading it carefully should be like second nature for those of us in the age of blogs and online news, as well as suggestive advertisements and so on.
As for the writing process, we have been instructed an uncountable number of times to brainstorm, research, outline, revise and proofread our papers. The writing process should practically be encoded in our DNA by the time we reach this college course. I don’t think that Raimes needs to take the time to explain this to most college writing students because most, if not all of them, should know how to read critically and to write and revise already. Whether the students follow those steps that have been branded into us in every English class since grade school is their choice.
Reading further, into her instructions for critical reading I still can’t say I disagree necessarily with what Raimes is saying, however, I felt almost as if I were wasting my time. We, as students, have been told to reread and jot down notes as we go for years. Looking words up in the dictionary that one doesn’t know should be common sense. Questioning the meaning of a piece of writing and reading it carefully should be like second nature for those of us in the age of blogs and online news, as well as suggestive advertisements and so on.
As for the writing process, we have been instructed an uncountable number of times to brainstorm, research, outline, revise and proofread our papers. The writing process should practically be encoded in our DNA by the time we reach this college course. I don’t think that Raimes needs to take the time to explain this to most college writing students because most, if not all of them, should know how to read critically and to write and revise already. Whether the students follow those steps that have been branded into us in every English class since grade school is their choice.
Ann Raimes
I agree completely with Ann Raimes that there are many different things that identify who we are as a person. Just the way that we were raised by our parents and how we spent our time and who we hung out with have a massive effect on shaping who we are. These many things build us and make the foundation of what we believe in and our morals. So like she says there are a numerous of things that happen to us in our lives that shape us in different ways. But in the end everyone might be alike in some ways, but we are all our own person and we are unique from everyone else.
As for the reading critically and strategies portion of the article, she has made a numerous amount of valuable points that you should look at. She provides us with many different strategies and unique tools that we can use to better understand what we are reading and to help interpret it.
I actually just had to read a short excerpt from Plato in one of my classes and it was around 60 pages long and we were told that we were going to have a quiz about it the next time we met. It would have been very helpful for me to have already read this article before hand. I feel that if I would have done that then I might have been able to understand what I was reading a lot better, and understand what the author was getting at and maybe not miss some important information that I missed the first time reading it.
Ann Raimes Intorduction
After reading Raimes's Introduction, I feel that I have a better sense on how to approach a text and on how to form a text. I never really considered the idea that once I write something and give it to someone else, that it becomes a representation of me. It becomes more than just a paper I had to write for a class. I have always dreaded peer reviews and turning papers into professors; it stresses me out thinking about what they may or may not say/think. I now recognize that it is a piece of literature (scholar worthy or not!) and that I am responsible for providing work that is clear, concise, and enticing no matter the audience or topic.
I also now have some good questions to consider when reading other’s work. I try to be open and unbiased when reading pieces, but let me be honest, that is almost impossible. Raimes’s statement “our culture might shape and influence us, but it does not exist apart from us,” could not be more true. Without each and every one of us having an opinion, having meaningful experiences, certain values and beliefs about the world, etc. culture would cease to exist. Therefore, each of us continually brings our own thoughts to the table when we become the reader. So having a clear set of questions to consider when actively reading, I think can prove really beneficial.
Reading
I also now have some good questions to consider when reading other’s work. I try to be open and unbiased when reading pieces, but let me be honest, that is almost impossible. Raimes’s statement “our culture might shape and influence us, but it does not exist apart from us,” could not be more true. Without each and every one of us having an opinion, having meaningful experiences, certain values and beliefs about the world, etc. culture would cease to exist. Therefore, each of us continually brings our own thoughts to the table when we become the reader. So having a clear set of questions to consider when actively reading, I think can prove really beneficial.
Reading and writing.
From reading the text of the introduction of Ann Ramies I really did understand where she was coming from when she was saying to reread details, and get to know some basic understandings. I have heard the same thing for years ever since I was able to write. Myself, as a student, has always struggled with understanding what the writer is trying to say, comprehension can be tough sometimes if you do not understand words or definitions in the text that you are reading. I really do like how she wrote out the definitions and made note of what she did not understand on the side of her margins. Since I have entered college the past year I have tried to come up with some of my own strategies on how to understand the texts that I am required to read for class but sometimes it is hard to follow if you are not interested in what you are reading. Only thing I wish Ann Ramies did in her writing was to come up with strategies on how to keep students focused on what they are reading. I think that is number one problem a majority of students have these days is the patience to focus and understand the materials we are permitted to understand.
I feel like Writing is such a process and you cannot be a good writer unless you are a good reader and know words and definitions and can know how to get a point across. So basically if you know how to read and understand concepts and such, then you will know how to be a more effective writer
Critically reading Ann Raimes introduction
Discovering our identity is something everyone goes through to different extents, as Ann Raimes wrote. It is often easy to forget that an identity is not just how others or we see ourselves, but what we actually are. Throughout time, revered persons of societies and philosophers have made extraordinary claims to explain what we didn’t know, such as the presence of a soul, or that we are tools for a greater purpose. Even today, many people settle for those claims, or will look no further than their societal roles as identities.
‘We are what we do’ is a simple idea – we react to incentives, act hopefully with expectations, and generally live economically and conditionally. As used as an example in the critical reading excerpt, people have the ego, id, and superego; the fact that we have multiple personalities and manipulate ourselves to fit our situation is not a new idea at all. As people we are encouraged since birth to believe that we are unique, priceless individuals with our own unique identity, in that we leave impressions on the path of time. Contemplating how many people have lived and melded in this continuous steaming collective consciousness, I have a hard time understanding if any of it is true. What value is there to the marks I’ve made on the world, next to the paths taken if I had never existed?
All things considered, it is undeniable that identities change with time: physically and mentally. A person can replace their limbs with prosthetic ones, have organ transplants, sever their brain, intoxicate themselves with chemicals and concoctions – this is the extent of how far one can go to change their physical identity and maintain life. One can go as far as asking if there is even a point to where we can associate one persons identity with their previous one. If we are replaceable, is identity merely just association and observation? Is an identity we create ourselves as real as one that can be observed naturally from the universe? What makes something real, anyway?
On critical reading: Aside from its usefulness in gaining new ideas and expanding one’s mind, reading critically continually reinforces what any reader would expect from texts, and in turn allows one to write more effectively. It’s not good to assume that people will read your papers and digest it the way the you indented them to. Writing effectively requires persuasion, stimulation, and keeping the readers attention.
‘We are what we do’ is a simple idea – we react to incentives, act hopefully with expectations, and generally live economically and conditionally. As used as an example in the critical reading excerpt, people have the ego, id, and superego; the fact that we have multiple personalities and manipulate ourselves to fit our situation is not a new idea at all. As people we are encouraged since birth to believe that we are unique, priceless individuals with our own unique identity, in that we leave impressions on the path of time. Contemplating how many people have lived and melded in this continuous steaming collective consciousness, I have a hard time understanding if any of it is true. What value is there to the marks I’ve made on the world, next to the paths taken if I had never existed?
All things considered, it is undeniable that identities change with time: physically and mentally. A person can replace their limbs with prosthetic ones, have organ transplants, sever their brain, intoxicate themselves with chemicals and concoctions – this is the extent of how far one can go to change their physical identity and maintain life. One can go as far as asking if there is even a point to where we can associate one persons identity with their previous one. If we are replaceable, is identity merely just association and observation? Is an identity we create ourselves as real as one that can be observed naturally from the universe? What makes something real, anyway?
On critical reading: Aside from its usefulness in gaining new ideas and expanding one’s mind, reading critically continually reinforces what any reader would expect from texts, and in turn allows one to write more effectively. It’s not good to assume that people will read your papers and digest it the way the you indented them to. Writing effectively requires persuasion, stimulation, and keeping the readers attention.
What are real writing/reading strategies?
During elementary, middle, high school, and college, I have been told how to read and how to write. Every teacher has said the same thing, read it over the first time to get a basic understanding, reread for details, and try reading the passages a third time to write your own thoughts and arguments, and to reword the author's writing so you can understand it better and completely. Truthfully, Ann Raimes did not say anything that moved me or enlightened me as a reader or a student. She is just repeating the same thing I have heard for years on end. The only thing I liked about her strategies is that she wrote questions in the margins and wrote a few definitions. That works perfectly with text books that you own, but when you're renting from a store/library or when the text is on the computer, it it's as effective. I think Ms. Raimes needs to update her writing strategies and concepts. For example, I think authors need to write how to help students stay on track and not zone out while reading online or on the computer. While reading this passage, I have visited MSNBC.com, Nytimes.com, and my gmail account countless times. I don't mean to do this, but her writing techniques are things I have heard countless times and I don't need to hear her redundant tips. If I were to have to write a paper about writing techniques, I would want to try to focus on the idea of “how do I catch the readers' attention and how do I keep it, yet keep my main idea/focus?” This is something I want to and need to read about, not relearning about first drafts, types of articles (persuasive, informative, etc). But regardless, thank you Ann Raimes for enlightening me, again, on how to read and write.
The Reading and Writing Process.
Ann Raimes definitely knows what she is talking about. Reading should not be a passive action. Passive readers cannot possibly understand the author's intent and content if they are not delving into the writing in front of them. The ideas of essays, blogs, books and articles are constantly mistaken. If readers would only take the time to read them more closely, I believe there wouldn't be as much stupid controversy over issues that weren’t there in the first place. By reading blogs and their responses, I’ve learned that readers create arguments out of thin air most of the time. Their objections have nothing to do with what the author actually wrote.
I get annoyed when people who read what I write miss my actual idea. Of course, readers have the freedom to interject their own opinions into any writing, but first they must understand the writer's.
If even I get annoyed by this, how much more should paid authors and journalists get upset when readers are incompetent and take their writing out of context? When I read something I begin with my own biases and opinions, but I still give the author the courtesy of actually reading what they wrote. If someone took the time to write out their thoughts, I might as well take the time to actually read those thoughts critically. Who knows, I might even learn something in the process.
Which brings me to my point, ladies and gentlemen: Reading is as much as a process as writing is a process. Reading and writing go hand in hand - you cannot do one without being able to do the other. Both processes require you to think and form opinions, analyze those thoughts and opinions, and organize those ideas into an understandable consensus.
There are readers who put these two actions together without even thinking about it, but I think there is a greater majority who don't even think it about it being done.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)